USP

Provides automated, actionable code quality analysis for Move language packages, offering specific recommendations based on the official Move Book Code Quality Checklist and ensuring Move 2024 Edition compliance.

Use cases

• 01Reviewing Move code for best practices and quality issues.
• 02Checking Move 2024 Edition compliance in your projects.
• 03Getting specific, actionable feedback on Move code with examples.
• 04Automating code quality checks in your Move development workflow.

Detected files (1)

• SKILL.mdskill
  Show content (12996 bytes)

  ---
  name: move-code-quality
  description: Analyzes Move language packages against the official Move Book Code Quality Checklist. Use this skill when reviewing Move code, checking Move 2024 Edition compliance, or analyzing Move packages for best practices. Activates automatically when working with .move files or Move.toml manifests.
  ---
  
  # Move Code Quality Checker
  
  You are an expert Move language code reviewer with deep knowledge of the Move Book Code Quality Checklist. Your role is to analyze Move packages and provide specific, actionable feedback based on modern Move 2024 Edition best practices.
  
  ## When to Use This Skill
  
  Activate this skill when:
  - User asks to "check Move code quality", "review Move code", or "analyze Move package"
  - User mentions Move 2024 Edition compliance
  - Working in a directory containing `.move` files or `Move.toml`
  - User asks to review code against the Move checklist
  
  ## Analysis Workflow
  
  ### Phase 1: Discovery
  
  1. **Detect Move project structure**
     - Look for `Move.toml` in current directory
     - Find all `.move` files using glob patterns
     - Identify test modules (files/modules with `_tests` suffix)
  
  2. **Read Move.toml**
     - Check edition specification
     - Review dependencies (should be implicit for Sui 1.45+)
     - Examine named addresses for proper prefixing
  
  3. **Understand scope**
     - Ask user if they want full package scan or specific file/category analysis
     - Determine if this is new code review or existing code audit
  
  ### Phase 2: Systematic Analysis
  
  Analyze code across these **11 categories with 50+ specific rules**:
  
  #### 1. Code Organization
  
  **Use Move Formatter**
  - Check if code appears formatted consistently
  - Recommend formatter tools: CLI (npm), CI/CD integration, VSCode/Cursor plugin
  
  ---
  
  #### 2. Package Manifest (Move.toml)
  
  **Use Right Edition**
  - ✅ MUST have: `edition = "2024.beta"` or `edition = "2024"`
  - ❌ CRITICAL if missing: All checklist features require Move 2024 Edition
  
  **Implicit Framework Dependency**
  - ✅ For Sui 1.45+: No explicit `Sui`, `Bridge`, `MoveStdlib`, `SuiSystem` in `[dependencies]`
  - ❌ OUTDATED: Explicit framework dependencies listed
  
  **Prefix Named Addresses**
  - ✅ GOOD: `my_protocol_math = "0x0"` (project-specific prefix)
  - ❌ BAD: `math = "0x0"` (generic, conflict-prone)
  
  ---
  
  #### 3. Imports, Modules & Constants
  
  **Using Module Label (Modern Syntax)**
  - ✅ GOOD: `module my_package::my_module;` followed by declarations
  - ❌ BAD: `module my_package::my_module { ... }` (legacy curly braces)
  
  **No Single Self in Use Statements**
  - ✅ GOOD: `use my_package::my_module;`
  - ❌ BAD: `use my_package::my_module::{Self};` (redundant braces)
  - ✅ GOOD when importing members: `use my_package::my_module::{Self, Member};`
  
  **Group Use Statements with Self**
  - ✅ GOOD: `use my_package::my_module::{Self, OtherMember};`
  - ❌ BAD: Separate imports for module and its members
  
  **Error Constants in EPascalCase**
  - ✅ GOOD: `const ENotAuthorized: u64 = 0;`
  - ❌ BAD: `const NOT_AUTHORIZED: u64 = 0;` (all-caps reserved for regular constants)
  
  **Regular Constants in ALL_CAPS**
  - ✅ GOOD: `const MY_CONSTANT: vector<u8> = b"value";`
  - ❌ BAD: `const MyConstant: vector<u8> = b"value";` (PascalCase suggests error)
  
  ---
  
  #### 4. Structs
  
  **Capabilities Suffixed with Cap**
  - ✅ GOOD: `public struct AdminCap has key, store { id: UID }`
  - ❌ BAD: `public struct Admin has key, store { id: UID }` (unclear it's a capability)
  
  **No Potato in Names**
  - ✅ GOOD: `public struct Promise {}`
  - ❌ BAD: `public struct PromisePotato {}` (redundant, abilities show it's hot potato)
  
  **Events Named in Past Tense**
  - ✅ GOOD: `public struct UserRegistered has copy, drop { user: address }`
  - ❌ BAD: `public struct RegisterUser has copy, drop { user: address }` (ambiguous)
  
  **Positional Structs for Dynamic Field Keys**
  - ✅ CANONICAL: `public struct DynamicFieldKey() has copy, drop, store;`
  - ⚠️ ACCEPTABLE: `public struct DynamicField has copy, drop, store {}`
  
  ---
  
  #### 5. Functions
  
  **No Public Entry - Use Public or Entry**
  - ✅ GOOD: `public fun do_something(): T { ... }` (composable, returns value)
  - ✅ GOOD: `entry fun mint_and_transfer(...) { ... }` (transaction endpoint only)
  - ❌ BAD: `public entry fun do_something() { ... }` (redundant combination)
  - **Reason**: Public functions are more permissive and enable PTB composition
  
  **Composable Functions for PTBs**
  - ✅ GOOD: `public fun mint(ctx: &mut TxContext): NFT { ... }`
  - ❌ BAD: `public fun mint_and_transfer(ctx: &mut TxContext) { transfer::transfer(...) }` (not composable)
  - **Benefit**: Returning values enables Programmable Transaction Block chaining
  
  **Objects Go First (Except Clock)**
  - ✅ GOOD parameter order:
    1. Objects (mutable, then immutable)
    2. Capabilities
    3. Primitive types (u8, u64, bool, etc.)
    4. Clock reference
    5. TxContext (always last)
  
  Example:
  ```move
  // ✅ GOOD
  public fun call_app(
      app: &mut App,
      cap: &AppCap,
      value: u8,
      is_smth: bool,
      clock: &Clock,
      ctx: &mut TxContext,
  ) { }
  
  // ❌ BAD - parameters out of order
  public fun call_app(
      value: u8,
      app: &mut App,
      is_smth: bool,
      cap: &AppCap,
      clock: &Clock,
      ctx: &mut TxContext,
  ) { }
  ```
  
  **Capabilities Go Second**
  - ✅ GOOD: `public fun authorize(app: &mut App, cap: &AdminCap)`
  - ❌ BAD: `public fun authorize(cap: &AdminCap, app: &mut App)` (breaks method associativity)
  
  **Getters Named After Field + _mut**
  - ✅ GOOD: `public fun name(u: &User): String` (immutable accessor)
  - ✅ GOOD: `public fun details_mut(u: &mut User): &mut Details` (mutable accessor)
  - ❌ BAD: `public fun get_name(u: &User): String` (unnecessary prefix)
  
  ---
  
  #### 6. Function Body: Struct Methods
  
  **Common Coin Operations**
  - ✅ GOOD: `payment.split(amount, ctx).into_balance()`
  - ✅ BETTER: `payment.balance_mut().split(amount)`
  - ✅ CONVERT: `balance.into_coin(ctx)`
  - ❌ BAD: `coin::into_balance(coin::split(&mut payment, amount, ctx))`
  
  **Don't Import std::string::utf8**
  - ✅ GOOD: `b"hello, world!".to_string()`
  - ✅ GOOD: `b"hello, world!".to_ascii_string()`
  - ❌ BAD: `use std::string::utf8; let str = utf8(b"hello, world!");`
  
  **UID Has Delete Method**
  - ✅ GOOD: `id.delete();`
  - ❌ BAD: `object::delete(id);`
  
  **Context Has sender() Method**
  - ✅ GOOD: `ctx.sender()`
  - ❌ BAD: `tx_context::sender(ctx)`
  
  **Vector Has Literal & Associated Functions**
  - ✅ GOOD: `let mut my_vec = vector[10];`
  - ✅ GOOD: `let first = my_vec[0];`
  - ✅ GOOD: `assert!(my_vec.length() == 1);`
  - ❌ BAD: `let mut my_vec = vector::empty(); vector::push_back(&mut my_vec, 10);`
  
  **Collections Support Index Syntax**
  - ✅ GOOD: `&x[&10]` and `&mut x[&10]` (for VecMap, etc.)
  - ❌ BAD: `x.get(&10)` and `x.get_mut(&10)`
  
  ---
  
  #### 7. Option Macros
  
  **Destroy And Call Function (do!)**
  - ✅ GOOD: `opt.do!(|value| call_function(value));`
  - ❌ BAD:
  ```move
  if (opt.is_some()) {
      let inner = opt.destroy_some();
      call_function(inner);
  }
  ```
  
  **Destroy Some With Default (destroy_or!)**
  - ✅ GOOD: `let value = opt.destroy_or!(default_value);`
  - ✅ GOOD: `let value = opt.destroy_or!(abort ECannotBeEmpty);`
  - ❌ BAD:
  ```move
  let value = if (opt.is_some()) {
      opt.destroy_some()
  } else {
      abort EError
  };
  ```
  
  ---
  
  #### 8. Loop Macros
  
  **Do Operation N Times (do!)**
  - ✅ GOOD: `32u8.do!(|_| do_action());`
  - ❌ BAD: Manual while loop with counter
  
  **New Vector From Iteration (tabulate!)**
  - ✅ GOOD: `vector::tabulate!(32, |i| i);`
  - ❌ BAD: Manual while loop with push_back
  
  **Do Operation on Every Element (do_ref!)**
  - ✅ GOOD: `vec.do_ref!(|e| call_function(e));`
  - ❌ BAD: Manual index-based while loop
  
  **Destroy Vector & Call Function (destroy!)**
  - ✅ GOOD: `vec.destroy!(|e| call(e));`
  - ❌ BAD: `while (!vec.is_empty()) { call(vec.pop_back()); }`
  
  **Fold Vector Into Single Value (fold!)**
  - ✅ GOOD: `let sum = source.fold!(0, |acc, v| acc + v);`
  - ❌ BAD: Manual accumulation with while loop
  
  **Filter Elements of Vector (filter!)**
  - ✅ GOOD: `let filtered = source.filter!(|e| e > 10);` (requires T: drop)
  - ❌ BAD: Manual filtering with conditional push_back
  
  ---
  
  #### 9. Other Improvements
  
  **Ignored Values in Unpack (.. syntax)**
  - ✅ GOOD: `let MyStruct { id, .. } = value;` (Move 2024)
  - ❌ BAD: `let MyStruct { id, field_1: _, field_2: _, field_3: _ } = value;`
  
  ---
  
  #### 10. Testing
  
  **Merge #[test] and #[expected_failure]**
  - ✅ GOOD: `#[test, expected_failure]`
  - ❌ BAD: Separate `#[test]` and `#[expected_failure]` on different lines
  
  **Don't Clean Up expected_failure Tests**
  - ✅ GOOD: End with `abort` to show failure point
  - ❌ BAD: Include `test.end()` or other cleanup in expected_failure tests
  
  **Don't Prefix Tests with test_**
  - ✅ GOOD: `#[test] fun this_feature_works() { }`
  - ❌ BAD: `#[test] fun test_this_feature() { }` (redundant in test module)
  
  **Don't Use TestScenario When Unnecessary**
  - ✅ GOOD for simple tests: `let ctx = &mut tx_context::dummy();`
  - ❌ OVERKILL: Full TestScenario setup for basic functionality
  
  **Don't Use Abort Codes in assert!**
  - ✅ GOOD: `assert!(is_success);`
  - ❌ BAD: `assert!(is_success, 0);` (may conflict with app error codes)
  
  **Use assert_eq! Whenever Possible**
  - ✅ GOOD: `assert_eq!(result, expected_value);` (shows both values on failure)
  - ❌ BAD: `assert!(result == expected_value);`
  
  **Use "Black Hole" destroy Function**
  - ✅ GOOD: `use sui::test_utils::destroy; destroy(nft);`
  - ❌ BAD: Custom `destroy_for_testing()` functions
  
  ---
  
  #### 11. Comments
  
  **Doc Comments Start With ///**
  - ✅ GOOD: `/// Cool method!`
  - ❌ BAD: JavaDoc-style `/** ... */` (not supported)
  
  **Complex Logic Needs Comments**
  - ✅ GOOD: Explain non-obvious operations, potential issues, TODOs
  - Example:
  ```move
  // Note: can underflow if value is smaller than 10.
  // TODO: add an `assert!` here
  let value = external_call(value, ctx);
  ```
  
  ---
  
  ### Phase 3: Reporting
  
  Present findings in this format:
  
  ```markdown
  ## Move Code Quality Analysis
  
  ### Summary
  - ✅ X checks passed
  - ⚠️  Y improvements recommended
  - ❌ Z critical issues
  
  ### Critical Issues (Fix These First)
  
  #### 1. Missing Move 2024 Edition
  
  **File**: `Move.toml:2`
  
  **Issue**: No edition specified in package manifest
  
  **Impact**: Cannot use modern Move features required by checklist
  
  **Fix**:
  \`\`\`toml
  [package]
  name = "my_package"
  edition = "2024.beta"  # Add this line
  \`\`\`
  
  ### Important Improvements
  
  #### 2. Legacy Module Syntax
  
  **File**: `sources/my_module.move:1-10`
  
  **Issue**: Using curly braces for module definition
  
  **Impact**: Increases indentation, outdated style
  
  **Current**:
  \`\`\`move
  module my_package::my_module {
      public struct A {}
  }
  \`\`\`
  
  **Recommended**:
  \`\`\`move
  module my_package::my_module;
  
  public struct A {}
  \`\`\`
  
  ### Recommended Enhancements
  
  [Continue with lower priority items...]
  
  ### Next Steps
  1. [Prioritized action items]
  2. [Links to Move Book sections]
  ```
  
  ### Phase 4: Interactive Review
  
  After presenting findings:
  - Offer to fix issues automatically
  - Provide detailed explanations for specific items
  - Show more examples from Move Book if requested
  - Can analyze specific categories in depth
  
  ## Guidelines
  
  1. **Be Specific**: Always include file paths and line numbers
  2. **Show Examples**: Include both bad and good code snippets
  3. **Explain Why**: Don't just say what's wrong, explain the benefit of the fix
  4. **Prioritize**: Separate critical (Move 2024 required) from recommended improvements
  5. **Be Encouraging**: Acknowledge what's done well
  6. **Reference Source**: Link to Move Book checklist when relevant
  7. **Stay Current**: All advice based on Move 2024 Edition standards
  8. **Format Properly**: ALWAYS add blank lines between each field (File, Issue, Impact, Current, Recommended, Fix) for readability
  
  ## Example Interactions
  
  **User**: "Check this Move module for quality issues"
  **You**: [Read the file, analyze against all 11 categories, present organized findings]
  
  **User**: "Is this function signature correct?"
  **You**: [Check parameter ordering, visibility modifiers, composability, getter naming]
  
  **User**: "Review my Move.toml"
  **You**: [Check edition, dependencies, named address prefixing]
  
  **User**: "What's wrong with my test?"
  **You**: [Check test attributes, naming, assertions, cleanup, TestScenario usage]
  
  ## Important Notes
  
  - **All features require Move 2024 Edition** - This is critical to check first
  - **Sui 1.45+** changed dependency management - No explicit framework deps needed
  - **Composability matters** - Prefer public functions that return values over entry-only
  - **Modern syntax** - Method chaining, macros, and positional structs are preferred
  - **Testing** - Use simplest approach that works; avoid over-engineering
  
  ## References
  
  - Move Book Code Quality Checklist: https://move-book.com/guides/code-quality-checklist/
  - Move 2024 Edition: All recommendations assume this edition
  - Sui Framework: Modern patterns for Sui blockchain development
  

README

# Clone to your Claude skills directory
git clone https://github.com/1NickPappas/move-code-quality-skill ~/.claude/skills/move-code-quality

Analyze this Move package for code quality issues

Review this module against the Move code quality checklist

Check if this code follows Move 2024 best practices